Washington, D.C. — The United States military is preparing contingency plans for potentially weeks-long operations against Iran, according to U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the discussions. The disclosure significantly raises the stakes for ongoing diplomatic efforts between Washington and Tehran and signals a sharp escalation in regional tensions.

Multiple defense sources indicate that planning scenarios extend beyond limited retaliatory strikes and could involve sustained operations targeting strategic infrastructure, military assets and potentially nuclear-related facilities if ordered by the White House.

Second Aircraft Carrier Deployed to the Middle East

The Pentagon has moved a second aircraft carrier strike group into the region, reinforcing U.S. naval presence amid concerns over Iran’s nuclear program and missile capabilities. The additional deployment follows a series of force posture adjustments that include fighter squadrons, missile defense systems and support personnel positioned across key regional bases.

Officials emphasize that no final decision has been made regarding military action, but operational readiness has intensified in recent days.

Diplomacy Under Pressure

The military preparations come as diplomatic channels remain active but strained. Talks mediated by regional actors have aimed at de-escalation and nuclear transparency measures, yet progress has reportedly slowed.

President Donald Trump stated that negotiations with Iran’s leadership have been “difficult,” adding that all options remain under consideration. In separate remarks, he suggested that regime change in Iran could be “the best thing” for regional stability — comments likely to further inflame tensions.

White House officials maintain that the administration prefers a negotiated solution but will not rule out military action if U.S. interests or allied security are threatened.

Shah’s Son Calls for Intervention

Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last shah, publicly urged Western governments to support decisive action against Iran’s clerical leadership. Speaking at an international security forum, he argued that sustained external pressure could accelerate political change within the country.

His comments reflect growing debate among policymakers and diaspora groups over whether diplomatic engagement or strategic coercion is the more effective path forward.

Regional and Global Implications

Security analysts warn that a prolonged U.S. operation could trigger retaliatory measures from Iran, including missile strikes on U.S. bases, maritime disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz or coordinated actions by allied militias across the region.

Energy markets are closely monitoring developments, as any disruption in Gulf shipping lanes could affect global oil supply and international trade flows.

What Comes Next

• Diplomatic talks remain fragile but ongoing.
• U.S. military assets are positioned for rapid escalation if ordered.
• Tehran has warned it would respond forcefully to any direct attack.

The unfolding situation represents one of the most serious U.S.–Iran confrontations in recent years and could reshape Middle East security dynamics in the weeks ahead.