Region:
USA
Category:
Politics

Trump trial: Dozens of jurors rejected as they say they cannot be impartial

  • Trump trial: Dozens of jurors rejected as they say they cannot be impartial
    Trump trial: Dozens of jurors rejected as they say they cannot be impartial
Region:
USA
Category:
Politics
Publication date:
Print article

In the unprecedented criminal trial of Donald Trump in New York, dozens of potential jurors have been dismissed due to concerns about their ability to remain impartial. The trial centers around allegations of falsifying business records to conceal a hush-money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels just before the 2016 election, an accusation vehemently denied by Trump. On the trial's first day, 60 out of 96 potential jurors quickly expressed their inability to serve impartially. This initial wave of dismissals underscores the challenge of assembling a jury of 12 unbiased individuals for such a high-profile case, particularly one involving a former president who is again seeking the White House.

"I just couldn't do it," remarked one prospective juror as she exited the courtroom, reflecting the sentiment of many who were excused.

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office alleges that Trump instructed his former attorney, Michael Cohen, to pay Daniels $130,000 (£104,000) in exchange for her silence about an alleged sexual encounter, with the purported aim of influencing the 2016 election. Trump maintains his innocence, pleading not guilty to the charges.

Jury selection, which commenced on Monday, is expected to span up to two weeks. The process involves scrutinizing potential jurors on various aspects, including their news consumption habits and any potential ties to Trump.

During the selection process, candidates were asked a series of 42 questions from the jury questionnaire. These queries ranged from their media consumption patterns to their participation in Trump-related events such as rallies or reading his books.

After initial dismissals, those remaining were further questioned. Eighteen individuals were randomly chosen to sit in the jury box and answer the questionnaire in detail.

Despite the rigorous screening process, some individuals revealed potential biases that led to their dismissal. For instance, one juror candidly admitted having strong opinions about Trump, while another disclosed personal habits that might affect impartiality.

It's worth noting that all jurors will remain anonymous due to the case's high-profile nature. However, both Trump's legal team and the prosecutors will have access to their identities, ensuring transparency in the trial proceedings.